Ehab El Sheemy
In
spite of the fact that most of us might think that ISIS is the sole beneficiary of the terrorist attacks on French Civilians in Paris
last night, it seems that the list extends to include many
others ..
Being
the only legitimate military force on the ground in Syria, Assad and Russia are
on the top of the list. The French decisions makers are now considering an
alliance with them against ISIS in Syria. If they have done it before in WWII
with the Bloody Stalin against Hitler, why not with them against ISIS ?
On
the other side of the Atlantic, and despite the emotional speech of solidarity
and sympathy with the victims just minutes after the attacks, Obama seems
determined to use this event to apply more pressures over France and European Allies to deploy more troops and
ground forces in Syria.
Looking
East, this attack would strongly support the radical positions of the East
European Governments that refused to give refuge to thousands of Syrian
Civilians who fled the raging war in
their homeland to safety in Europe. A decision that was based on fears that
ISIS members might be among the refugees.
Across
the English Channel, another beneficiary is at 10 Downing Street. Cameron is no
more in need to justify the long lasted “ Severe Threat Level “ security status
that enabled him to deploy and apply strict security and surveillance
procedures all over the UK, and most important of all, the large amount of
budget that is allocated to cover the cost of the military support to the
United States in the Middle east and Afghanistan.
Down
to the South, Egypt, Tunisia, and Libya will make use of these attacks to
highlight the obligation of the free world to support them against the great
and present danger of ISIS. A danger that should be bottled-up before finding
its way through the northern shores of the Mediterranean right to the heart of
Europe.
The
only and greatest loss here, is that of those who lost their beloved ones for nothing
but allowing the expansion of terrorism for the sake of the super powers lousy
political and influential considerations in the Middle East.
No comments:
Post a Comment